Skip to content
Offset.health

Back to the overview

Omega-3 as EPA and DHA

The strongest single lifestyle lever on triglycerides in our catalogue and at the same time the textbook example of an offset: the same amount that lowers triglycerides often raises LDL with DHA-containing preparations.

Big LeverEffort: moderate

Sign in to save this plan

Dose in the studies

In the underlying studies: The cited studies used two to four grams of EPA and DHA combined per day. What counts is the amount of EPA and DHA, not the amount of fish oil or the number of capsules.. That is the reported study figure, not a recommendation to take it.

A supplement is not a lifestyle recommendation. Speak with your doctor.

Plant-based alpha-linolenic acid from linseed or rapeseed oil is not the same thing: conversion to EPA and DHA is limited, and this batch has no defensible percentages. There is no effect row on uric acid or ferritin for the supplement. Fish as food is named as purine-rich; milligrams are in the food search. Meta-analyses describe excess atrial fibrillation from about one gram per day. Time to the full triglyceride effect is not stated in the opened abstracts.

Effects in detail

Each row is a directed edge from our database, with range, latency, evidence grade and the condition under which it applies at all.

MarkerEffectLatencyMode of actionOutcomeEvidenceConditionSources
Apolipoprotein Bhelps. Lowers Direction known, size not established

Meta-analyses consistently show a small LDL-C rise with EPA+DHA (Eslick +0.06 mmol/L; AbuMweis +0.15 mmol/L) that is attributable to DHA (Wei & Jacobson); the AHA advisory confirms the rise at 4 g/day in very high TG and its absence with EPA-only products. This is the classic omega-3 'offset': TG down, LDL-C slightly up. Trial proxy: ldl_c. Pulling the other way, the same AHA advisory states that in the largest 4 g/day trials non-HDL-C and ApoB were modestly decreased, so total atherogenic particle number fell — with no pooled figure in the abstract. Both readings stand; we carry the quantified direction and record the counter-reading here rather than showing two contradictory edges.

not specifiedchronicunclear
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value
Diastolic blood pressurehelps. Lowers -0.99 mmHg

confidence interval of the estimate, not the range one person can expect

Seventy randomised trials give a pooled systolic reduction of 1.52 mmHg (95 % CI -2.25 to -0.79) and diastolic of 0.99 mmHg with EPA plus DHA supplementation. This adds a second, modest benefit to the batch-1 omega-3 lever, which was built on triglycerides.

not specifiedchronicunclear
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value
Systolic blood pressurehelps. Lowers -1.52 mmHg

confidence interval of the estimate, not the range one person can expect

Seventy randomised trials give a pooled systolic reduction of 1.52 mmHg (95 % CI -2.25 to -0.79) and diastolic of 0.99 mmHg with EPA plus DHA supplementation. This adds a second, modest benefit to the batch-1 omega-3 lever, which was built on triglycerides.

not specifiedchronicunclear
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value
Triglycerideshelps. Lowers Direction known, size not established

the absolute bounds are two pooled estimates, -0.34 and -0.37 mmol/L, from two meta-analyses at a mean 3.25 g/day; neither is an interval. The percentage pair is a different thing again: 15 % is derived at a baseline of 200 mg/dL and 30 % is the advisory's figure at 4 g/day in very high triglycerides

The effect grows with baseline and dose. About −30 mg/dL at a mean 3.25 g/day; at least 30 percent at 4 g/day in very high triglycerides. REDUCE-IT (pure EPA) cut events, STRENGTH (EPA+DHA) did not.

not specifiedpostprandial and chronicunclear
Evidence grade A
TG at or above 150 mg/dL

What this measure costs

Counteracting effects of the same measure.

MarkerEffectLatencyMode of actionOutcomeEvidenceConditionSources
LDL cholesterolcosts. Raises Direction known, size not established

the low bound is mixed EPA+DHA supplements, the high bound is DHA monotherapy

not specifiedchronicunclear
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting valueNo source on file

Moves without implying progress

Informational or no established effect: the marker moves or was checked, and that is not progress.

MarkerEffectLatencyMode of actionOutcomeEvidenceConditionSources
HDL cholesterolmoves, and does not count. Raises Direction known, size not established

the low bound is mixed EPA+DHA supplements, the high bound is DHA monotherapy

Small and driven by DHA; EPA barely changes HDL. Not an outcome-relevant effect, and too small to “fix” low HDL.

not specifiedchronicno
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value
HbA1cchecked, nothing happens. No established effect

Across 20 randomised trials in type 2 diabetes, omega-3 supplementation produced no marked change in HbA1c, fasting glucose or postprandial glucose, while lowering triglycerides by 0.24 mmol/L. A deliberate no-effect row.

not specifiedchronicunclear
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value
high-sensitivity CRPmoves, and does not count. Lowers Direction known, size not established

A dose-response meta-analysis of 40 randomised trials found a significant non-linear reduction in CRP up to 1200 mg/day of EPA and DHA in cardiometabolic disease. No pooled mg/L figure is given in the abstract, so no magnitude is entered.

not specifiedchronicunclear
Evidence grade B
applies regardless of the starting value
HOMA-IRchecked, nothing happens. No established effect

confidence interval of the estimate, not the range one person can expect

The largest systematic review (83 RCTs, high AMSTAR-2 quality) found no effect of long-chain omega-3 on HOMA-IR (+0.06, 95 % CI -0.21 to 0.33), fasting insulin or HbA1c and a trivial fasting glucose rise (+0.04 mmol/L); an earlier meta-analysis of 11 RCTs was also null overall. Included as a 'no effect' row: omega-3 is not an insulin-sensitiser.

24–24 weekschronicno
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value

Food sources

What you would have to eat to reach the stated order of magnitude, and what comes along with it.

FoodContent per 100 gAmount per weekAdded burden
Algal oil

The source without a fish burden: no purines, no mercury, no retinol. No BLS row; EPA and DHA content is product-dependent. 25 g per 100 g remains a typical label figure, not a table value.

25.0 g56 gequals 11 ×no relevant added burden on file
Cod liver oil

BLS Q730000, cod-liver oil. 17667 µg retinol per 100 g: 5 g carries 883 µg of preformed vitamin A. Unsuitable in pregnancy. No upper-intake-level source was opened in this batch.

23.0 g61 gequals 12 ×
  • Retinol 17,667.0 µg
  • Saturated fat 19.1 g
Farmed salmon

BLS T410132, poached salmon. In Germany this is typically Atlantic farmed salmon; BLS does not split farmed from wild on this code. Purines 249.9 mg/100 g from the 2024 USDA analysis, Atlantic farmed salmon raw. The FDA mercury row does not separate farmed from wild.

1.9 g725 gequals 4.8 ×
  • Mercury 2.2 µg
  • Sodium 37.0 mg
  • Saturated fat 2.6 g
  • Purines 249.9 mg
Wild salmon

BLS T417152, stewed wild salmon — Pacific salmon, not Atlantic wild. Purines 259.8 mg/100 g from the 2024 USDA analysis, sockeye raw. The FDA mercury row does not separate wild from farmed.

1.7 g828 gequals 5.5 ×
  • Mercury 2.2 µg
  • Sodium 47.0 mg
  • Saturated fat 2.2 g
  • Purines 259.8 mg
Anchovies

BLS T104702, anchovy in oil, canned, drained. 4951 mg sodium per 100 g; a 10 g portion still carries 495 mg. Purines 321 mg/100 g from Clifford 1976 (canned).

0.9 g1.6 kgequals 54 ×
  • Mercury 1.6 µg
  • Sodium 4,951.0 mg
  • Saturated fat 2.3 g
  • Retinol 22.0 µg
  • Purines 321.0 mg
Herring

BLS T102132, poached herring. Purines 139.2 mg/100 g from Kaneko 2014 (raw) in the USDA purine database. Mercury from the FDA herring row.

2.0 g700 gequals 5.4 ×
  • Mercury 7.8 µg
  • Sodium 107.0 mg
  • Saturated fat 2.4 g
  • Retinol 10.0 µg
  • Purines 139.2 mg
Mackerel

BLS T107182, mackerel fried without fat. Purines 204.8 mg/100 g from Kaneko 2014 (raw). Other mackerel species in the same FDA table run higher in mercury (chub 0.088 ppm, Spanish 0.182 ppm).

1.4 g986 gequals 6.6 ×
  • Mercury 5.0 µg
  • Sodium 155.0 mg
  • Saturated fat 1.8 g
  • Retinol 55.0 µg
  • Purines 204.8 mg
Sardines in oil

BLS T105702, sardine in oil, canned, drained. Purines 399 mg/100 g from Clifford 1976 (canned) in the USDA purine database.

2.4 g574 gequals 6.4 ×
  • Mercury 1.3 µg
  • Sodium 366.0 mg
  • Saturated fat 2.4 g
  • Retinol 49.0 µg
  • Purines 399.0 mg
Rainbow trout

BLS T420132, poached trout. Purines 181 mg/100 g from Kaneko 2014, rainbow trout raw.

0.9 g1.5 kgequals 10 ×
  • Mercury 7.1 µg
  • Sodium 44.0 mg
  • Saturated fat 1.3 g
  • Retinol 7.0 µg
  • Purines 181.0 mg
Canned light tuna

BLS T121902, tuna canned in its own juice, drained. Sodium in this BLS row is calculated near zero (no added salt). Little EPA and DHA, so this is lean protein rather than an omega-3 source. Purines 211.8 mg/100 g from the 2024 USDA analysis, drained canned solids. Canned albacore is about three times higher in mercury in the same FDA table.

0.1 g10.8 kgequals 72 ×
  • Mercury 12.6 µg
  • Sodium 1.0 mg
  • Saturated fat 0.2 g
  • Purines 211.8 mg

Sources

Full details of every study the rows above rely on.

  1. Association Between Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake and Dyslipidemia: A Continuous Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Wang et al. · Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1161/JAHA.123.029512PubMed 37264945

  2. Omega-3 Fatty Acids for the Management of Hypertriglyceridemia: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association

    Skulas-Ray et al. · Circulation · 2019 · Guideline

    DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000709PubMed 31422671

  3. Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid containing supplements modulate risk factors for cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomised placebo-control human clinical trials

    AbuMweis et al. · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · 2018 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1111/jhn.12493PubMed 28675488

  4. Effect of High-Dose Omega-3 Fatty Acids vs Corn Oil on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk: The STRENGTH Randomized Clinical Trial

    Nicholls et al. · JAMA · 2020 · Randomised trial

    DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.22258PubMed 33190147

  5. Benefits of fish oil supplementation in hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Eslick et al. · International Journal of Cardiology · 2009 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.092PubMed 18774613

  6. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid and insulin sensitivity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Akinkuolie et al. · Clinical Nutrition · 2011 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.08.013PubMed 21959352

  7. Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid versus docosahexaenoic acid on serum lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Wei & Jacobson · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · 2011 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1007/s11883-011-0210-3PubMed 21975919

  8. Omega-3, omega-6, and total dietary polyunsaturated fat for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Brown et al. (PUFAH Group) · BMJ · 2019 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1136/bmj.l4697PubMed 31434641

  9. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia

    Bhatt et al. (REDUCE-IT Investigators) · New England Journal of Medicine · 2019 · Randomised trial

    DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1812792PubMed 30415628

  10. Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish (1990-2012)

    US Food and Drug Administration · FDA food-safety data table · 2012 · Reference data

  11. Consumption of fish and vascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies

    Alhassan et al. · Atherosclerosis · 2017 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.09.028PubMed 28992469

  12. Dose-dependent effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on C-reactive protein concentrations in cardiometabolic disorders: a dose-response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

    Amlashi et al. · Inflammopharmacology · 2025 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1007/s10787-025-01744-8PubMed 40263171

  13. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Glucose Control and Lipid Levels in Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis

    Chen et al. · PLoS One · 2015 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0139565PubMed 26431431

  14. Bundeslebensmittelschlüssel (BLS), Version 4.0 – Deutsche Nährstoffdatenbank

    Max Rubner-Institut · 2025 · Reference data

    Official German nutrient database, open data CC BY 4.0. Values per 100 g edible portion. Attribute the Max Rubner-Institut as publisher.

    DOI 10.25826/Data20251217-134202-0

  15. Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Miller et al. · American Journal of Hypertension · 2014 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1093/ajh/hpu024PubMed 24610882

  16. USDA and ODS-NIH Database for the Purine Content of Foods, Release 2.0

    Heydorn KC, Wu X, Garrett TJ, et al. · 2025 · Reference data

    Free purine milligrams per 100 g. Includes 2024 USDA analyses and selected literature, including Kaneko 2014 (source b). Not a German official source; Souci-Fachmann-Kraut is licensed and was not used.