Skip to content
Offset.health

Back to the overview

B vitamins (folate, B12, B6)

Lower homocysteine. Lowering it did not prevent infarctions in the outcome trials.

Small DialEffort: low

Sign in to save this plan

Order of magnitude

The folate, B12 and B6 doses used in the lowering trials.

This is the database's clearest case of a marker that moves and an outcome that does not.

Effects in detail

Each row is a directed edge from our database, with range, latency, evidence grade and the condition under which it applies at all.

MarkerEffectLatencyMode of actionOutcomeEvidenceConditionSources
Diastolic blood pressurehelps. Lowers -0.24 mmHg

confidence interval of the estimate, not the range one person can expect

Twenty-two randomised trials in 41,633 participants give a systolic reduction of 1.10 mmHg (95 % CI -1.93 to -0.28) and a diastolic reduction of 0.24 mmHg with folic acid supplementation. outcome_proven is no: the same intervention was tested against hard outcomes in 71,422 people and did not reduce myocardial infarction or death, although it did reduce stroke by 10 %.

not specifiedchronicno
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value
Systolic blood pressurehelps. Lowers -1.10 mmHg

confidence interval of the estimate, not the range one person can expect

Twenty-two randomised trials in 41,633 participants give a systolic reduction of 1.10 mmHg (95 % CI -1.93 to -0.28) and a diastolic reduction of 0.24 mmHg with folic acid supplementation. outcome_proven is no: the same intervention was tested against hard outcomes in 71,422 people and did not reduce myocardial infarction or death, although it did reduce stroke by 10 %.

not specifiedchronicno
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value
HOMA-IRhelps. Lowers -0.40 HOMA-IR units

confidence interval of the estimate, not the range one person can expect

Across 24 randomised trials, folic acid lowered HOMA-IR by 0.40 (95 % CI -0.70 to -0.09), fasting blood glucose by 2.17 mg/dL and fasting insulin by 1.63 pmol/L. outcome_proven 'no': for this intervention the outcome trials exist and are null.

not specifiedchronicno
Evidence grade B
applies regardless of the starting value

What this measure costs

Counteracting effects of the same measure.

No counteracting effect is on file for this measure. That does not mean there is none, only that we found no defensible edge.

Moves without implying progress

Informational or no established effect: the marker moves or was checked, and that is not progress.

MarkerEffectLatencyMode of actionOutcomeEvidenceConditionSources
HbA1cchecked, nothing happens. No established effect

A dose-response meta-analysis of 24 randomised trials found no effect of folic acid on HbA1c (-0.27 percentage points, 95 % CI -0.73 to +0.18, p = 0.246), although fasting glucose, fasting insulin and HOMA-IR did improve slightly. outcome_proven is no rather than unclear because for B vitamins the outcome question has actually been answered: 15 randomised trials in 71,422 people found no reduction in myocardial infarction or death.

not specifiedchronicno
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value
Homocysteinemoves, and does not count. Lowers -25.0 %

confidence interval of the estimate, not the range one person can expect

Individual data on 1114 people in 12 randomised trials: folic acid lowered homocysteine by 25 % (95 % CI 23 to 28), vitamin B12 added a further 7 % (3 to 10) and vitamin B6 added nothing. outcome_proven is 'no', and that is the point of including this marker at all.

not specifiedchronicno
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value

Sources

Full details of every study the rows above rely on.

  1. Folic Acid Supplementation Improves Glycemic Control for Diabetes Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Asbaghi et al. · Nutrients · 2021 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.3390/nu13072355PubMed 34371867

  2. Folic acid supplementation and blood pressure: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of 41,633 participants

    Asbaghi et al. · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · 2023 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1080/10408398.2021.1968787PubMed 34478339

  3. Effects of lowering homocysteine levels with B vitamins on cardiovascular disease, cancer, and cause-specific mortality: meta-analysis of 8 randomized trials involving 37,485 individuals

    Clarke et al. (B-Vitamin Treatment Trialists' Collaboration) · Archives of Internal Medicine · 2010 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.348PubMed 20937919

  4. Lowering blood homocysteine with folic acid-based supplements: meta-analysis of randomised trials

    Clarke R (Homocysteine Lowering Trialists' Collaboration) · Indian Heart Journal · 2000 · Meta-analysis

    PubMed 11339443

  5. Homocysteine-lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular events

    Marti-Carvajal et al. (Cochrane) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD006612.pub5PubMed 28816346