Skip to content
Offset.health

Back to the overview

Isometric exercise training

Static contraction, such as handgrip. In network comparisons one of the stronger training levers on blood pressure.

Small DialEffort: low

Sign in to save this plan

Order of magnitude

Four two-minute bouts, three to five times a week.

Isometric training produced the largest blood-pressure reduction of any exercise mode in a 270-trial network meta-analysis and ranked first with a SUCRA of 98.3 %.

Effects in detail

Each row is a directed edge from our database, with range, latency, evidence grade and the condition under which it applies at all.

MarkerEffectLatencyMode of actionOutcomeEvidenceConditionSources
Diastolic blood pressurehelps. Lowers -4.00 mmHg

one bound only: no interval is printed

In a network meta-analysis of 270 randomised trials, isometric exercise training lowered resting blood pressure by 8.24/4.00 mmHg, the largest effect of any exercise mode and roughly twice that of aerobic training. Point estimates without confidence intervals in the abstract, so one bound each.

not specifiedchronicunclear
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value
Systolic blood pressurehelps. Lowers -8.24 mmHg

one bound only: no interval is printed

In a network meta-analysis of 270 randomised trials, isometric exercise training lowered resting blood pressure by 8.24/4.00 mmHg, the largest effect of any exercise mode and roughly twice that of aerobic training. Point estimates without confidence intervals in the abstract, so one bound each.

not specifiedchronicunclear
Evidence grade A
applies regardless of the starting value

What this measure costs

Counteracting effects of the same measure.

No counteracting effect is on file for this measure. That does not mean there is none, only that we found no defensible edge.

Sources

Full details of every study the rows above rely on.

  1. Exercise training and resting blood pressure: a large-scale pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Edwards et al. · British Journal of Sports Medicine · 2023 · Meta-analysis

    DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106503PubMed 37491419